Insights

In an era where consumers are increasingly aware of environmental issues, many companies have adopted green marketing strategies to appeal to this eco-conscious demographic. However, not all green claims are genuine. 

As stakeholders have looked into the legitimacy of these claims, a wave of litigation has emerged against some of the world’s largest corporations.

What Is Greenwashing?

The term “greenwashing” describes the practice of companies misleading consumers about the environmental benefits of their products or practices. This can involve exaggerating claims, omitting key details, or presenting false information about the sustainability of products, services, or business practices. The goal is often to capitalize on the growing demand for environmentally responsible products without committing to the genuine sustainability measures that would justify such claims.

The Rise of Greenwashing Litigation

As consumers and regulatory bodies become more vigilant, greenwashing is increasingly being challenged in courts around the world. Litigation in this area often involves claims of false advertising, deceptive trade practices, or violations of environmental laws. The lawsuits typically aim to hold companies accountable for misleading consumers and to push for greater transparency and authenticity in environmental marketing.

High-Profile Greenwashing Cases

Several big companies have found themselves embroiled in greenwashing lawsuits in recent years. Here are a few notable examples:

Nike: Sustainability Claims

In 2023, Nike faced a class action lawsuit that claimed its recycled polyester apparel isn’t sustainable as the brand claimed. According to the lawsuit, Nike had over 2,400 products identified in the sustainability collection but only 239 of those were actually made using recycled materials.

Delta Airlines: Carbon Neutral Claims

In 2023, Delta Air Lines faced a class action lawsuit over its “carbon neutral” claims. Claimants alleged that Delta’s operations were not in fact carbon neutral and were still contributing to releasing additional carbon into the atmosphere. The lawsuit alleged that Delta made the claims in violation of consumer protection laws as well as laws that prohibit fraudulent and unfair business practices.

H&M: “Conscious Collection” Claims

Fashion giant H&M has faced criticism and legal action over its “Conscious Collection,” which it marketed as a sustainable line of clothing. In 2022, the company was sued for allegedly exaggerating the environmental benefits of the collection. The lawsuit claimed that H&M’s sustainability scorecards for its products were misleading, as they gave the impression that the products were more environmentally friendly than they actually were. 

Coca-Cola: Misleading Recycling Claims

Coca-Cola has faced legal challenges over its environmental claims, particularly regarding its plastic packaging. In 2021, the company was sued for allegedly misleading consumers about the recyclability of its plastic bottles. The lawsuit argued that Coca-Cola’s marketing created the false impression that its bottles were 100% recyclable and that the company was effectively managing plastic waste, when in reality, much of the plastic ended up in landfills. 

The Future of Greenwashing Litigation

As environmental awareness continues to grow, so too will the scrutiny of corporate green claims. Companies that engage in greenwashing risk not only legal action but also significant damage to their reputations and consumer trust. To avoid these pitfalls, businesses must ensure that their environmental claims are accurate, transparent, and backed by evidence.

For more insights on legal trends and more, subscribe to RapidFunds on LinkedIn. RapidFunds has been providing settlement funding for almost 20 years. We’ve completed over 4,000 transactions and have helped thousands of firms with funding. Stop waiting for your legal fees and contact RapidFunds today. 

Let’s Talk

Please complete the form below and we will be in contact with you as soon as possible.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.